Town of Olds council ponders city status

Tuesday, May 01, 2012 02:50 pm | Julie Bertrand

Town of Olds council pondered the pros and cons of having Olds become a city at its policies and priorities meeting on April 16.

Before the 2011 federal census numbers were released, town CAO Norm McInnis had asked manager of strategic affairs Samantha Saretsky to compile a study on the pros and cons of gaining city status.

“We had done some work in anticipation of our census number from the 2011 federal census to be a little bit higher than they actually turned out to be, at 8,235,” said McInnis.

According to the Municipal Government Act, a city may be formed in an area where there is a population of 10,000 or more.

Saretsky talked to administration employees from Okotoks, Beaumont, Strathmore, and Lacombe to get an idea of the challenges they face in their municipalities.

“Primary concerns seem to be public support, whether your community wants to essentially advertise itself as having that small-town feel, or if you want to advertise that you have a big-city environment,” said Saretsky.

The biggest impact of Olds becoming a city would be on the highways.

“We would take control of the highways running through the municipality,” said Saretsky.

“We would be responsible for all maintenance done on those roads, which are extremely costly.”

However, a city would get access to some additional grant funding. Since the number of road kilometres maintained by the city would increase, the city would therefore get more funding from grant programs, such as the Basic Municipal Transportation Grant. The city would also become eligible for the Provincial Highway Maintenance Grant. Nonetheless, the city would lose its Street Assistant Program grant, through which Olds get $60 per capita. The city would also become ineligible for the Resource Road/New Industry Program, and the Local Road Bridge Program.

Saretsky’s report made clear that a municipality does not have to become a city unless it wants to. For example, Sherwood Park remains a hamlet, even though it has a population of 65,475.

Moreover, Municipal Affairs requires the municipality to get public input about the change from town to city.

Mayor Judy Dahl said she was interested in taking it to Olds residents at the 2013 municipal election.

“It would be a good opportunity where everybody comes,” she said.

“It could be a question to see what they think, much like Strathmore did.”

Coun. Mary Jane Harper disagreed with Dahl’s suggestion.

“We have a few years to think about this yet. I wouldn’t be in favour of putting it on the 2013 question for municipal elections, because I think we are too far away from that,” said Harper.

“I am in favour of putting this as part of council’s service plan for communication with our citizens.”

In the end, council agreed to accept Saretsky’s report as information and to revisit the option when Olds had a population of 10,000 or more.


Be the FIRST to comment!

Got something to say? Post Comment!

You haven't entered any comments to post!

The Olds Albertan welcomes your opinions and comments. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher.

In order to post comments on our web site, you must validate your email address. An email was sent to you when you registered that included an activation link. If you have not yet done so, please click on the link to activate your account.

If you did not receive your activation email, please click here to have it resent.

To post comments, you must login or register on
Story URL:

Copyright © 2010 Great West Newspapers Limited Partnership. All rights reserved. The contents of this website are protected by copyright and may be used only for your personal non-commercial purposes. All other rights are reserved and commercial use is prohibited. To make use of any of this material you must first obtain permission of the owner of the copyright. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher.